Luke Skywalker: Ben! Why didn’t you tell me? You told me that Darth Vader betrayed and murdered my father.
Obi-Wan: Your father… was seduced by the Dark Side of the Force. He ceased to be the Jedi Anakin Skywalker and “became” the Sith Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So, what I told you was true… from a certain point of view.
Luke Skywalker: A certain point of view?
Obi-Wan: Luke, you’re going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view. Anakin was a good friend. When I first met him, your father was already a great pilot. But I was amazed how strongly the Force was with him. I took it upon myself to train him as a Jedi. I thought that I could instruct him just as well as Yoda. I was wrong.
Luke Skywalker: There is still good in him.
Obi-Wan: He’s more machine now than man. Twisted and evil.
Luke Skywalker: I can’t do it, Ben.
Obi-Wan: You cannot escape your destiny. You must face Darth Vader again.
Luke Skywalker: I can’t kill my own father.
Obi-Wan: Then the Emperor has already won. You were our only hope.
Luke Skywalker: Yoda spoke of another.
Obi-Wan: The other he spoke of is your twin sister.
Luke Skywalker: But I have no sister.
Obi-Wan: Hmm. To protect you both from the Emperor, you were hidden from your father when you were born. The Emperor knew, as I did, if Anakin were to have any offspring, they would be a threat to him. That is the reason why your sister remains safely anonymous.
Luke Skywalker: Leia! Leia is my sister.
Obi-Wan: Your insight serves you well. Bury your feelings deep down, Luke. They do you credit, but they could be made to serve the Emperor.
And isn’t that what this is really all about, anyway? What if Luke turned to the Dark Side, becoming a tool of the Emperor? Or joined Vader and ruled the galaxy as father and son? Obi-Wan simply lies the entirety of the story away in order to guarantee such never occurs and Luke remains good.
And is it poor writing on Lucas’ side because Luke doesn’t get angrier? What about the way in which the whole story takes less than three minutes to tell and everyone is all buddy-buddy at the end?
Further, how did Lucas manage to completely mangle the visual re-telling of this important and crucial story (Episodes I-III) from a “certain point of view” (while also managing to drag out what should have been one of the most epic lightsaber battles ever filmed)? That was supposed to be the reason the prequels were made, and while I have grown to enjoy them over time, I still remember the frustration of watching each of them as they were released and thinking, with each successive one, “Man, that could have been so much better.”
So, instead, we’re left with the messiness of the Obi-Wan business, never to have the proper story told to us–to ME–the way it should have been.
Don’t get me wrong: I love Star Wars and always will, but that doesn’t mean I have to accept lousy storytelling or incongruent storylines.
Anywho, next up is TESB, the movie which introduced me to cliffhanger endings and my all-time favorite musical piece “The Imperial March” (Darth Vader’s Theme) by John Williams.
May the Force be with you!
Real quick, if you couldn’t tell, this post has absolutely nothing to do with gaming. It will be a political rant, however. You’ve been warned.
So, a couple of things have got me concerned about our current political situation, and I’m not just talking about Kim and Trump’s button sizes or what’ll really happen when their pissing contest escalates. Nope, I’m talking about states’ rights and treasonous activities.
AG Sessions released his memo today which backs away from the hands-off approach towards recreational marijuana that the former administration undertook. Basically, Sessions is telling US attorneys in the states were pot is legal to fully prosecute marijuana-related crimes. In the process, this new directive is telling states, “Hey, the Federal government doesn’t care that your citizenry legally voted something into law.”
It’s the evil marijuana, this time, but what’s next?
(CBS News reports that at one point in the last few years”[Sessions suggested] that it fell to Congress to change the classification of marijuana as an illegal drug if it didn’t want DOJ to enforce the law against it.” Very valid point, I’ll give him that, and one I actually support. Likelihood of happening? Unknown, really.)
Sure. I get that marijuana is still considered illegal overall by the Feds, but where does this new decision leave the places where marijuana has been voted into legalization at the local level? How will those states respond? If you read the linked article, you’ll see that reaction has been swift and negative, condemning Sessions’ missive as judicial overreach. I actually hope the states push back or, at the very least, the voters in those places send a message to Washington.
I also hope all of the Republicans who’ve been shouting about states’ rights and Federal overreach join the fray against this action. This is a prime example of what they’ve been arguing against for the last eight years every time the Feds enforced some new rule or policy regarding the environment or healthcare. They certainly made valid points in their arguments against Federal mandates.
Likewise, now, more than ever, the Democrats need to reach across the aisle to those very Republicans (if they are, indeed, in an uproar over the infringement) and join with them against this egregious Federal dictum. Would the current political climate even allow such joining of forces?
(Are the states’ rights folks really willing to go to bat for the cause if it’s about pot and its legality? The million dollar question, huh? I would. Marijuana helped me get through cancer. I was able to walk right into a store and buy it without fear of arrest. Yes, the drug has an intoxicating effect, but chiefly it allowed me to continue living while chemical poison was being pumped into my body to kill the life-threatening malignancy. I didn’t want to hurt anyone, nor did I become a drug-addled fiend.)
(Edit: New York has just asked Congress to act in passing a law which keeps the Federal overreach regarding AG Sessions’ memo from affecting states where laws have already been enacted at the state level. Of note, Democrats are behind this new legislative push, while the states’ rights advocates from the Republican side are silent…)
Now, let’s talk treason. Just a few lines, I promise. It’s about Bannon.
If you’re gonna go on record and say something which happened was treasonous, and that the FBI should have been notified, then why weren’t you the one doing the notifying? You had close, personal contact with this administration on a daily basis. If something went down that needed stopping by our premiere law enforcement agency, why wait to reveal such information in a book?
What’s to gain by waiting when we have everything to lose?
Stardate 5027.3: Captain James T. Kirk has ordered the crew of the USS Enterprise across the Neutral Zone and into Romulan space, his reasoning unclear. Eventually, the ship is surrounded by two Romulan Battle Cruisers and a single Romulan Bird of Prey, the flagship of this small fleet. Kirk and Commander Spock beam aboard the flagship to have a conversation with the Romulan Commander who happens to be a woman. Spock seemingly betrays Kirk, the latter having some sort of psychosis when he tries going through a force field which contains him inside a Romulan brig. Dr. McCoy arrives, checks out the captain and finds him mentally broken, discusses prognosis with Spock, Kirk snapping and calling Spock a traitor and attacks the Vulcan. Kirk receives a Vulcan Death Grip and dies. Bones takes Kirk’s body back to the Enterprise.
Meanwhile, Spock and the female Romulan commander make eyes at one another, a lot of fingertip to brow and cheek touching takes place, and the Romulan commander goes and changes into something less military and more loungewear-like. On the Enterprise, we learn, via a startled Nurse Chapel, that Kirk still lives and the subterfuge is revealed: It’s all been a plan to get a hold of a Romulan cloaking device. McCoy performs a little facial reconstruction on Kirk and turns him into a Romulan, and the captain beams back aboard the Bird of Prey, sneaks around, Kirk-fu’s a few Romulan security guards, steals the cloaking device and escapes. Spock’s dubiousness unfolds, and just as he’s about to meet the Romulan House of Pain, he gets a beam-out rescue once Chekov manages to isolate his DNA from his Romulan distant kin-folk. The Romulan commander throws herself on Spock as he’s dematerializing and ends up in the Enterprise transporter room with the Vulcan.
Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott, charged with wiring the cloaking device to the starship, has a tough time, at first, Kirk bugging him about needing the device running yesterday, Scotty yelling, “I’ma doin’ the best I can!” The three Romulan vessels go to battlestations mode, Kirk demanding that Sulu “Get us out of here, warp factor nine!” A brief chase ensues, but finally the cloaking device kicks in and the Enterprise disappears and escapes back over into Federation space.
It’s an awesome episode from the third season of the Original Series.
It also happened to be the second mission we drew in our first game of Star Trek Panic. Needless to say, we weren’t as lucky as Captain Kirk and his legendary crew.
The latest game which utilizes the Castle Panic engine, this particular iteration is steeping with the Star Trek theme and is much more difficult than the original version. It’s a cooperative game, each player taking on the role of one of the characters from the Original Series. Kirk, Spock, Uhura, Sulu, Chekov, Bones, Scotty, are all available, and each has a special ability which will help during crucial phases of a game turn.
Each player gets a turn which is divided into phases. First, you draw a number of cards until you reach the hand size limit based on the number of players. Cards can be useful items, phaser targets, specialty cards, and some of them have small insignia along the bottom of the card that denotes whether it is a command, science, medical or engineering card. More about that is a moment. Next, if necessary, you reveal a new mission.
Revealing a mission is simple: there are 18 missions available, each on a card which details the specifics of the mission and how it needs to be accomplished, including how many turns you must complete the mission within for success. There are different kinds of missions; for The Enterprise Incident, you need to manuever into short-range with a Romulan Bird of Prey, and commit four cards out of the players’ hands, two each of command and engineering–the latter use the cards with the appropriate insignia on them. So, a new mission is only drawn on the player’s turn if a mission is not currently underway. Also, to beat the game you need to complete five missions.
Third phase of a player turn allows for the trading of one card between the current player and another. Fourth phase is when the player uses the cards from his hand to either damage the enemy starships, or use them for the special ability they confer, or to commit towards mission victory. The player may use as many cards as they have in their hand, and in any order. Likewise, during this phase, the player may manuever the Enterprise one sector, right or left, on the board, or move forward towards some target. To replicate moving forward, all of the pieces in the two forward arcs are moved one range closer to the ship.
Fifth phase is where the player checks the mission status, and whether or not victory has been achieved or if a another turn on the mission turn board has been used. If the turn marker is moved to the zero spot before the mission is completed then the mission is a failure.
The sixth phase is where the game can get extremely nerve-wracking. This is the point when all of the Klingon, Romulan, or Tholian starships on the board move one range closer to the Enterprise. There are only three ranges, long, medium, and short. Then each enemy gets to fire, causing a minimum of one damage per hit. Your shields can only take two hits, as well as your hull. Ship damage can quickly become catastrophic if you cannot manage to destroy the enemy vessels during the fourth phase.
The seventh phase is when new threat tokens are drawn, two each player turn. The player draws them one at a time, and if it is an enemy starship a d6 is rolled to determine which arc the ship is placed within. The ship will always be placed in the long-range of that arc. Some of the threats are immediate, random events, like a comet or ion storm, whereas one of them is a starbase that offers the player help if they can get the Enterprise within short-range in order to dock.
What can happen quite quickly is the game escalates from a manageable combat situation, like that pictured above from the television episode, to something far, far worse. Every player adds two threat tokens to the board at the end of their turn. We had four players and, granted, not each token was an enemy starship, but they quickly added up.
We lost when our Enterprise took its sixth and final hull damage, the left warp nacelle blasted into oblivion by one of the nine enemy vessels surrounding the weakened Federation ship. There was no hope of repairing, we had lost maneuverability several player turns earlier, and still onward they came, Romulans, Klingons, and the pesky Tholians.
Was the game fun? Yes, and no. I think it’s much more manageable with fewer players or, maybe, better skilled players. We played as a family. It was late when we started, and all of us are used to the semi-casual nature of Castle Panic. However, I believe we were just starting to get the rhythm down when all hell broke loose and our ship was overwhelmed.
Still, it wouldn’t be a Panic game if it weren’t overwhelming at some point. And it certainly was, but in a good way. There’s a lot of fun, even in defeat.
Live long and prosper.
Star Trek: The Original Series pictures used are copyright CBS.
Happy Sunday everyone. Hopefully, you tossed a few dice, checked results on a CRT, and played the right OPS card at the right time. Speaking of which, I’d like to thank the folks over at the various wargame-centric Facebook pages for taking a look herein, and also for answering my question regarding LNL’s Rommel at Gazala CRT results! The answer is rather obvious…now that it was suggested. Thanks, again!
So, this is a continuation of brief descriptions/AARs/musings over the remaining two games I played in the last week. Both were solo affairs, and in the end I liked one a lot more than the other. Let’s go!
Always searching for a great solo ‘Nam game, I picked up this title and had high hopes for it.
With Khe Sanh ’68 by Decision Games we have a small format game which uses a point-to-point movement system, is somewhat card-driven, and is entirely a solitaire game. I love Vietnam War consims, and the battle for Khe Sanh is an excellent choice for exploration.
Pictured above is the game after set-up and before the first turn. NVA units are inverted to facilitate the fog of war through-out game play. The hexagons are US firebases, the squares clear, the circles jungle, the triangles hills, the red stars the NVA bases, the red squares NVA entrenchments. The cards represent different actions depending on sides; the US cards give reinforcements, bonuses, and help determine if a turn is used or not. The OPFOR cards completely dictate movement for the NVA, also bringing in reinforcements, and adding some bonuses. The overall objective: keep or take Khe Sanh.
US always goes first. You pick a card and use it, bring in reinforcements, move, and have combat. The NVA draws a card which determines whether they get to do any of those actions. There is a number on each card, both US and OPFOR, which determines if turns are used (or added) to the turn track.
I’ve played this game twice, and have won with a “Tactical Victory” each time. Unfortunately, it’s a leaves a hollow victory in my gut. The game is extremely repetitive, with choices that don’t really feel all that effective. Maybe, in some regards, this simulates the Vietnam conflict all too well? As a game, it’s tedious. Fortunately, it doesn’t take up a great deal of time.
Okay, I know: not a wargame. I cover all types of games herein, so if you’re only visiting for consims this is your chance to make a quick exit.
I love Victory Point Games (VPG) States of Siege games, their wargames, and a number of their Euros, this specific title falling into the latter category. I have bought all of their partnered titles with GMT, and had hoped for a long relationship between the two publishers. I helped Kickstart their Nemo’s War, 2nd Edition. I am extremely curious about their recent news of leaving California, overseas printing, and their relocation process.
So, after the rather depressing game of Khe Sanh ’68, I brought out Disaster on Everest (DoE). Pictured above is the game at set-up, before first play.
You pick a team of guides and hikers out of four possible teams. Each guide and hiker has their own movement values, and their own abilities and skills–each allows some sort of travel or survival bonus, but varied enough to be both interesting, and challenging to play. The team starts at the High Camp spot on the board; above, the rectangle at the bottom of the board with the two square markers (the guides) and the six circular marker (hikers).
The object: lead the hikers to the top of Everest and then back down to the High Camp. Points are awarded for success, or are lost due to misfortune.
Gameplay starts with a random drawing of an event token. Each token has three items of importance to game flow: the event itself, the cost in prestige to buy the event, and a number which represents which passes are blocked with snow. While there is duplication of event tokens, there are enough included within the components to not draw the same one (generally) twice in a row. So, there are some events which you will want to purchase, like oxygen tanks (which help with movement), and others which represent catastrophes that slow movement or even kill hikers. All the while, there are threats of a storm brewing; unpurchased event tokens are placed on the Storm Watch track , and once the six spaces are filled the storm hits. Movement is reduced, and the game is over in nine turns.
The combination of events, passes being blocked with snow, a brewing storm, and the need to reach the top of Everest, makes for a nail-biting experience. There were hikers I was rooting for, one guide which I thought was better, and I really hoped to achieve the summit and bring the team back home.
Only two of my team made it to the summit, Candie and Fernando, and as you can see above, Candie was two spaces away from reaching High Camp on her descent. Fernando still had three passes to navigate. Simon and Hektor never made it beyond the South Summit.
When the game is over, you return all of the event tokens to the drawing cup and pick one for each character. See the tokens in the Storm Watch track? See how they have Lost, Near, Medium, and Far, with Saved, Live, or Die? You draw one for each hiker (not the guides) and determine whether they made it back to High Camp if still on the board making their way up or down Everest. In the picture above, none of my team had gotten lost (see the empty Lost box?), so I had to draw for all hikers in the green “Near” circles, and the one in the red or “Far” circle. The ones in the black circles near the top were doomed, and I drew all “Die” results for the remainders. The guide with Candie is allowed to sacrifice himself, so she didn’t die, but then I didn’t get many points for her regardless.
After the complete team wipe, I scored a -15. The result: horrific loss.
But dang if it wasn’t fun losing! I’ll bring this gem back out, guaranteed!
Been a good week for some gaming! I somehow managed to get four separate games on the table, a record for the last few years. I think I’ve been averaging pretty well, but not at this level in some time.
Let’s get going, shall we? This post will discuss the two games covering the North African Front that I played this week.
I won this game through the Facebook Wargamer Pay it Forward group, which is an outstanding community of goodwill and generosity. A couple of weeks back, I had played my first World War II North African Front game, Avalon Hill’s Afrika Korps (which Rodger MacGowan immortalized for me by featuring my pictures in his art), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I wanted to dig deeper into the campaign, so I decided to break out Blood & Sand.
I love the components! The map, while jammed with information, is pretty good and invokes the terrain well. The unit counters are colorful, use NATO symbols, and are sizeable enough for my old eyes. The rules are eight pages long.
The game is IGO-UGO, and initiative is decided with a die roll. The scenario I played, Crusader, actually has the Allies start first during the first turn, but otherwise a roll is made for the rest of the game-which is only three turns in length. The rest of a player turn consists of checking supply, determining supply points (used for attacks), moving, and combat.
I really like how supply works: Axis starts with 25 points, Allies 35. During their individual turns, each side rolls 2d6, and adds to the total ports which they control that have supply points. These supply points are then used during attacks. Depending on how far away each side is from their supply source, the map is divided into supply zones which has a cost in supply points that infantry and mechanized units must spend to attack. Example: I have a British armor and two infantry units in Supply Zone A which is one of the furthest zones away from Alexandria, the Allied supply source. The Allies have a 4/8 supply point cost, each infantry unit attacking spending 4 points, each armor 8. Thus, I would spend 16 points using the abovementioned units, which is subtracted from the overall supply points generated at the beginning of the Allies’ turn. Defenders do not pay anything when attacked.
What I didn’t like about the game was its Risk-like, buckets of dice rolling during combat. Each unit has a combat factor that indicates the number of dice rolled during combat. Dependent terrain will cause one less die roll. Infantry hits on a “6” while armor gets a hit on a “5 or 6” roll. So, if my infantry from above had combined combat factors of 2, while the armor was a 3, I would roll a total of 5 dice. I used different colored dice to differentiate between infantry and armor. Combat is also simultaneous, so the defender is also rolling dice. First hits are step reductions (or eliminations, depending upon the unit) and are assigned by the opponent, then the owner determines whether to reduce further or retreat units for two spaces for each hit.
It was mind-numbing rolling the many dice and determining first hits, retreats, simultaneously because I was soloing. Combat really wore the game down. I would imagine the combat phase would be something altogether different with more than one player.
I might add that the game uses cards which help out each respective side, but the scenario I played does not use them.
Another hit out of the park for LNL! Production quality is top-notch, from the map to the unit counters to the rules. It seemed like this would be a quick game to play…
…until I got into combat and suddenly couldn’t wrap my head around the Combat Results Table. I went to the rules to clarify, and my mind (to this moment) is still boggled by what is probably a simple concept that I am completely failing to comprehend.
So, I rolled on the CRT during combat (when else would you, huh?), and I got a 1/2 result. That’s not a half, but a 1 and a 2, attacker to defender. I can either lose a step or retreat with my result. Not one or the other, but either one. I get to choose. What?
Am I dense and not getting it? Why would I ever choose to lose a step if I can retreat instead? Help me, Obi-wan!
So, I reached out to LNL. Crickets. I asked for clarification on their Facebook page, their Board Game Geek page, and on their website forums. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? So, I’m stymied. Once I get my answer, I will return to the table and see what sort of havoc I can wreak in North Africa.
My next entry in a day or so will cover my playthroughs of Decision Games’ Khe Sanh ’68, a solitaire mini-game, and Victory Point Games’ Disaster on Everest, another solitaire that is quite the nailbiter!